![]() ![]() However, they never restrain themselves from customizing Solr to the maximum extent.īTW, I see that there are more resources on Solr (4.x) than Lucene (4.x). There are people, falling under ' have to use Lucene' camp, but still prefer Solr to plain Lucene as it's easy to use. Solr is very flexible and provides a lot of pluggable API points, allowing you to throw-in your code. I don't mean that Solr is hard to customize. Your infrastructure requirements outweigh search customization requirements.You want something that is ready to use out-of-the-box (even without knowledge of Java) OR. #Apache lucene vs solr software
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |